
Aligned sales and marketing with shared attribution data.
Aligned sales and marketing with shared attribution data.
BrightPath ended the sales vs. marketing blame game by giving both teams a shared view of which accounts were influenced by ads before entering pipeline.


The Challenge
BrightPath had a classic alignment problem: marketing claimed they were generating quality pipeline through LinkedIn Ads, while sales insisted their outbound efforts created every deal. Neither team had the data to prove their position, and the friction was affecting company culture.
The Solution
BrightPath deployed RevenueProven as a shared source of truth. Both marketing and sales could see which companies had engaged with LinkedIn Ads before any sales touchpoint — and which deals were truly cold outbound.
The Results
Attribution data showed that 62% of "outbound" deals had actually been influenced by LinkedIn Ads — the prospect had seen multiple ads before the SDR reached out. This insight transformed the relationship between the teams.
Sales started prioritizing outreach to ad-engaged accounts, increasing their acceptance rate by 28%. Marketing gained credibility and budget support. Most importantly, both teams started collaborating on account strategy instead of arguing about credit.
Key Takeaway
Sales and marketing alignment isn't a culture problem — it's a data problem. When both teams can see the full buyer journey, blame turns into collaboration.
The Challenge
Like many B2B teams, this company could see LinkedIn Ads activity and CRM pipeline, but could not confidently connect the two. Engagement lived in the ad platform, deals lived in the CRM, and the link between them was assembled by hand — if at all. That gap made it hard to defend spend, prioritise campaigns, or show leadership where revenue was really coming from.
The core problem was attribution at the account level. B2B buying committees are large and sales cycles are long, so the moment a deal closes is rarely the moment a campaign did its work. Without a company-level view, attribution stayed guesswork.
The Approach
Revenue Proven connects LinkedIn Ads engagement to CRM revenue at the company level, so B2B teams can prove which campaigns influenced real pipeline and closed-won deals. It pulls company-level engagement from the LinkedIn Ad Analytics API across five lookback windows (180, 90, 60, 30, and 7 days), matches those companies to HubSpot or Salesforce accounts by domain and name, and surfaces influenced pipeline and influenced revenue alongside a company-by-company journey timeline.
Rather than chase person-level signals, the team focused on the accounts their campaigns actually reached and on whether those accounts showed up in pipeline. Because B2B buying involves many people and many touches over long sales cycles, Revenue Proven uses multi-touch, company-level attribution rather than last-click, giving credit across the accounts an ad actually reached. This reframed the question from "which ad got the last click" to "which campaigns influenced the companies that became opportunities."
How Revenue Proven Attribution Worked
Revenue Proven pulled company-level engagement from LinkedIn across multiple lookback windows and matched those companies to CRM accounts by domain and name. Influenced pipeline and influenced revenue were then surfaced alongside a company-by-company journey timeline, so the team could trace how engagement preceded and accompanied real deals.
Because the analysis was grounded in the company's own connected data, the results were defensible. OAuth tokens are encrypted at rest, data is processed per workspace, and company-level reporting avoids the brittleness of cookie-based, person-level tracking. The reporting held up in front of both sales and finance, which is what turned it from a marketing dashboard into a shared source of truth.
The Results
The headline outcome is summarised at the top of this case study. Beyond that figure, the bigger shift was operational: marketing could finally point to specific campaigns and accounts and say, with evidence, that they influenced pipeline. That clarity changed how budget was allocated and how performance was reported.
With a repeatable, company-level attribution model in place, the team moved from defending spend after the fact to steering it proactively — investing in the campaigns reaching the accounts most likely to convert, and trimming the ones that generated engagement without progressing deals.
A note on measurement
Because B2B buying involves many people and many touches over long sales cycles, Revenue Proven uses multi-touch, company-level attribution rather than last-click, giving credit across the accounts an ad actually reached. OAuth tokens are encrypted at rest, data is processed per workspace, and company-level reporting avoids the brittleness of cookie-based, person-level tracking. Keeping connections active and syncing regularly is the simplest way to keep influenced pipeline and revenue accurate over time.
Why account-level reporting wins
Person-level tracking degrades as cookies and identifiers disappear, but company-level attribution stays stable because it follows the accounts your campaigns reached. That is what makes the reporting defensible in front of both sales and finance.
Turning insight into action
Once influenced pipeline is visible by company, the next step is operational: invest more in the campaigns reaching accounts that are progressing through the pipeline, and rework the ones generating engagement without movement. Revenue Proven connects LinkedIn Ads engagement to CRM revenue at the company level, so B2B teams can prove which campaigns influenced real pipeline and closed-won deals.
Want results like Aligned sales and marketing with shared attribution data.?
Connect your accounts in 5 minutes and start proving LinkedIn Ads ROI.
Start Free Trial